carnevalemanfredonia.it
» » Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes, and the National Exit Poll

eBook Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes, and the National Exit Poll download

by Richard Charnin

eBook Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes, and the National Exit Poll download ISBN: 144908527X
Author: Richard Charnin
Publisher: AuthorHouse (March 31, 2010)
Language: English
Pages: 456
ePub: 1368 kb
Fb2: 1773 kb
Rating: 4.3
Other formats: mbr txt docx azw
Category: History
Subcategory: World

Proving Election Fraud pulls back the curtain and exposes the pattern of election fraud over the past four decades

Proving Election Fraud pulls back the curtain and exposes the pattern of election fraud over the past four decades. The information is all there - if the experts care to look. -Michael Collins in "Scoop Independent News". Anyone who cares about the truth and our democracy would do well to get a copy of this book ASAP. Introduction 1 1 From Hanging Chads to Phantom Voters 5 2 Media Lockdown 20 3 The Simple Math 29 4 Forbidden Data 40 5 The Election Forecasting Game 63 6 Election Model: A Trip to Monte Carlo 71 7 Exit Polls: Forced to Match 78 8 Calculating the True Vote 97 9 1968-1996: Age of Innocence 101 10 2000: Shock to the.

Richard Charnin (Truth Is All). I have written two books on election fraud which prove that the recorded vote is always different from the True Vote

Richard Charnin (Truth Is All). Quantitative Analysis: JFK Assassination and Election Fraud/True Vote Models. Recent Election Fraud Posts. I have written two books on election fraud which prove that the recorded vote is always different from the True Vote. Unlike the misinformation spread in the media, voting machine glitches are not due to machine failures. It’s the fault of the humans who program them. In the 1968-2012 Presidential elections, the Republicans won the average recorded vote by 4. -45.

Proving Election Fraud book. Proving Election Fraud is a comprehensive resource for analyzing presidential elections from 1968 to 2008, including the 2006 midterms. It is written for readers of virtually all backgrounds. The only requirement is an inquisitive, open mind. The True Vote is estimated using basic statistical modeling that is for some reason avoided in the media and academia.

Clinton won the recorded vote by . million

Clinton won the recorded vote by . million. But the recorded vote is never equal to the True Vote due to election fraud. There is evidence that millions of illegals probably voted in 2016.

Labour's vote is down around 8% on the 2017 general election . She said Scotland had sent a "very clear message" that it did not want a Boris Johnson Conservative government and the prime minister did not have a mandate to take Scotland out of the EU.

Labour's vote is down around 8% on the 2017 general election, with the Tories up by just over 1% and the smaller parties having a better night. Sir Ed Davey and Lib Dem president Sal Brinton are taking over as interim party leaders.

Stock deals are rigged for insiders. Big money runs Congress. And we've gone to war based on a series of calculated lies. Are you willing to accept the fact that our elections are subject to the same type of corruption?

Stock deals are rigged for insiders. If you are, then Proving Election Fraud by Richard Charnin pulls back the curtain and exposes the pattern of election fraud over the past four decades. It's not a mystery when your look at the numbers and check them against multiple public sources.

Similar Articles Added Earlier. The New York State Democratic Primary election was a blatant exercise in voter suppression and fraud.

Город: Delray Beach, FloridaРабота: Aerospace/defense; Wall Street Investmen.

Comments: (6)
Brakora
The book gives a lot of data, which allows to check the calculations and opinions.
It's instructive to learn that elections with paper-trail show a difference with exit poll's whitin the margin of error (2%), while elections without paper trail (touch screens 7%, optical scanner §%, mechanical levers (11%) punch cards (7%)are whitin the margin of error, except in a startling number of swing-state elections.
The vote-count in the US is simply too unreliable, and analysis of the data raise serious questions about very probable election-fraud in nearly all elections.
The only weak point is that the book too often repeats itself, sometimes even two times the same sentence on one page (e.g. pag. 101).
But if you are concerned about the state of the American democracy, this is a must-read!
Faezahn
More than you really want to know, but you feel that nothing has been glossed over or missed. A well researched, extensively cited study of dirty political tricks.
Malhala
Richard Charnin is an expert in this field, the real deal, and, to put it simply-- He proves amazing things with numbers. He does amazing things with the data, and it isn't magic, it's Math. He's like that great teacher whom you (hopefully) had in high school, that took the data that everyone else could see but didn't know what to do with, applied proven formulas, and extracted dramatic answers from it all that you hadn't even suspected were there. He does that clearly and concisely and it has broad, striking implications. Great book.
Bad Sunny
Richard Charnin used to do the math necessary for the design of space craft and advanced fighters. Here he turns his professional skills to election fraud that consistently produces election results at great variances from both the "true vote" count and the vote count indicated by voters surveyed in scientific exit polls.

The survival of a constitutional democracy in the United States may well depend upon whether this important news is disseminated among the American people and law enforcement agencies before the November 2012 election in which both the Presidency and control of the United States Senate are at stake.

Cliff Arnebeck, Election Attorney
Columbus, Ohio
Opithris
FRAUDSTER
Kagalkree
The premise of the author's book is that Republicans have been able to systematically get an extra 5-10% of fraudulent votes counted. However, he is sure there is no fraud on the Democrats side. This is all done by taking raw data and not normalizing it at all.

Here is a quick example of his faulty thinking. Let's suppose a state where there are 50% registered republicans and democrats each. If news organizations talk to 10 people and 6 say they are democrats and voted democratic and 4 said they were republican and voted republican, the author would maintain that real electorate is 60% Dem and 40% Rep. When the election results come out and show a 50-50 tie, the author assumes a 10% fraud by republicans. He doesn't realize that he needs to normalize the exit poll with reality. The exit pollsters do not talk to everyone. They take a sample and then based on known demographics apply it accordingly.

For all of his charts, graphs and simulations, it is too bad he doesn't understand statistics at all. The only fraud that this reveals is the author's own thinking.