carnevalemanfredonia.it
» » The Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey, Vol. 2 (Volume 2)

eBook The Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey, Vol. 2 (Volume 2) download

by A. H. M. Jones

eBook The Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey, Vol. 2 (Volume 2) download ISBN: 080183354X
Author: A. H. M. Jones
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press (June 1, 1986)
Language: English
Pages: 774
ePub: 1329 kb
Fb2: 1779 kb
Rating: 4.1
Other formats: rtf azw mobi txt
Category: History
Subcategory: Europe

Classic study of the late Roman Empire 284-602, volume I. These books are the seminal works on Late Roman history. All historiography of the past fifty years has begun here.

Classic study of the late Roman Empire 284-602, volume I. Much like Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire inspired writers of the 18th and 19th Century, this book inspired the authors who would create the field of Late Antiquity. Not that I would take the comparison too far: Gibbon's book is infinitely better written and quotable.

The Later Roman Empire 284-602, a Social Economic and Administrative Survey, by A. H. M. Jones (Oxford, 1964), in three volumes. Jones' classic work, which is considered one of the best narrative histories of late Rome and early Byzantium, begins with the reign of the Roman ruler Diocletian (285-305) and ends with that of the Byzantine emperor Maurice (582-602)

The Later Roman Empire 284-602, a Social Economic and Administrative Survey, by A. Contents: 15. Senators and Honorati; 16. Civil Service; 17. Army; 18. Rome and Constantinople; 19. Cities; 20. The Land; 21. Industry, Trade, Transport; 22.

The Later Roman Empire 284-602: A Social, Economic and Administrative Survey. The church added to this economic burden while also creaming off able men. In the West, that the senators didn't leave many independent small holdings didn't help. 0801832853 (ISBN13: 9780801832857). The civilian population didn't bear arms and wasn't expected to fight. it didn't, unless led.

The later roman empire 284-602 a social economic and administrative survey. By a. jones professor of ancient history in the university of cambridge. VOLUME ll. Basil blackwell oxford 1964.

Volume 34, Issue 4. December 1965, pp. 458-459. The Later Roman Empire 284–602: a Social, Economic and Administrative Survey. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1964. University of Chicago.

Items related to Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social Economic an. .Bibliographic Details. Title: Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social. All books wrapped with great care and shipped promptly. List this Seller's Books.Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social Economic and. Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social Economic and Administrative Survey. Publisher: Basil Blackwell, Oxford. Publication Date: 1973. Payment Methods accepted by seller.

Other readers will always be interested in your opinion of the books you've read. Whether you've loved the book or not, if you give your honest and detailed thoughts then people will find new books that are right for them. Byung-Chul Han. Год: 2014.

Roman empire 284-602 a social economic and administrative survey by a. jones professor of ancient history in the university of cambridge volume ll basil blackwell oxford. VOLUME II (xv ). ENATORS AND HONORATI-the aristocratic ideal, 52;-4; 'Z ordo equester, comitiva and senate, 525-;o; admission and prece- dence, 5;0-5; privileges and burdens, 5;5-42; the value of rank, 54;-5; the social composition of the senate, 545-52; the geo- graphical distribution of senators, 55 2-4; the wealth.

Declining Rome Surveyed - JonesA. The Later Roman Empire: 284–602. Volume 15 Issue 3 - Robert Browning. A Social, Economic and Administrative Survey. Pp. xvi + 1–522; vi + 523–1068; 448; 7 maps in portfolio. Oxford: Blackwell, 1964. net. - Volume 15 Issue 3 - Robert Browning.

Classic study of the late Roman Empire 284-602, volume II
Comments: (7)
Oreavi
The history of the Later Roman empire has been surveyed by many English speaking scholars. Gibbon, Bury and others have analysed the empire and have rendered their judgments. A.H.M. Jones does the same, but his book is very different. This book examines all the nuts and bolts which made up the Dominate from the accession of Diocletian to the fall of Maurice (284-602). Thus, instead of an analysis of military campaigns, Jones' text tells you how the Roman army was fed and paid. Exhaustive examinations of the financial bureaucracy, land use, the church as an institution, among other topics, make this work the last word in reference for the late empire. Most scholarship of late empire cannot afford to neglect Jones' text.

The book consists of two sections. The first is a chronological survey of the empire from the 3rd century to the 7th. Here the text focuses mainly on institutional and administrative changes in the running of the empire. For example, you will learn more about the emperor Julian's policy toward city lands and taxes than his invasion of Persia. Important events in the empire are still mentioned, but Jones' text is looking more at the long view of the machinery of both state and society. In this section, there is also a short chapter on the Germanic successor kingdoms in the former Western empire.

The second section is the heart of this text. Government, Administration, Finance, Justice, Senators, Civil Service, Army, Cities, Land, Church, Culture are all tackled in a top down fashion and chronological fashion. The discussion on the three different finance departments was the most complex part of the text.

The work has several maps and Jones added some appendices. This is a seminal work and a treasure for students and scholars of the empire from Diocletian's stabilisation to the partial collapse in the 7th century.
Landarn
Simply masterful - you can't even hope to understand the Late Antique period without this work at your disposal
Akta
This is the second tome of AHM Jones massive Survey of the Latter Roman Empire. It should best be read together with the first volume, if only because it includes all of the notes and annexes for both volumes. However, its six chapters could possibly be read on their own, although I would not advise this.

It is often been said of these volumes that they are "seminal", which is perfectly true, although readers might not realize to what extent this is the case. I tried to provide a number of answers in my review of volume I and will try to do the same here, and add a couple of things that I forgot to mention previously.

First, and despite being published in 1964, much of the issues raised, the book's contents and the conclusions made are still valid, or have become areas of (often heated) discussions among historians. A typical example is the debate about the causes of the Fall of the (West) Roman Empire. Jones provided one of the first in-depth analysis of these causes and factors, which two generations of historians have then explored, one cause at a time. To give a few examples, A. Ferrill insisted on the (most traditional) military explanation (1986) while a couple of years latter, Ramsey Mc Mullen rather insisted on "Corruption and the Decline of Rome" (the title of his book), believing, contrary to Jones, that the internal weakening of the Empire was a key reason for the Fall. More recently, this divide has been, yet again, illustrated by the books of Goldsworthy, insisting on the internal causes, and of Heather, more inclined to put more weight on the pressure from the BArbarians in general, and on Attila, in particular. Regardless of your preferred explanation, or even if you believe that BOTH types of explanations are in fact valid and even interacted with each other (less taxes meaning less soldiers, meaning a lower ability to defend the Empire and a higher risk of being defeated, meaning in turn less taxes as provinces were either devasted repreatedly or lost), what is important ot note is that these discussions largely started with Jones. It is therefore unsurprising, and perfectly fitting, that a nujmber of leading historians of the Late Roman Empire will be publishing in a few months a whole book (which, of course, you will be able to find on Amazon)assessing much better than I can ever do the major contributions that Jones had had and how the issues he tackled have evolved over time.

Second, another major area of research which opened up after this book was published was to explain why the West fell (old Rome) but not the East (Constantinople/New Rome) which very much survived the Barbarian attacks in the fifth century and ultimetly became the Byzantine Empire, also surviving the invasions from the Avars, the Slavs and the Bulgars and the Arabs in particular. Here again, numerous explanations have been offered and they are summarized and discussed in an excellent book from Williams and Friell first published in 1999 ("The Rome that Did Not Fall"). One of the main conclusions of this book is that the Eastern part WAS more populated and richer than the Western part of the Roman Empire; conclusions that are only tentative in Jones but that are demonstrated in this book. It had also more cohesion and its society and its economy were less "unhealthy" to use Jones' expression. At about the same time and latter on, other books have also drawn attention to the huge importance and disparities in richness and the corrupting and disrupting political influence that a very small but ultra rich number of families that made up the Roman Senate had in the West thanks to their huge wealth inherited down the centuries. They contrasted this with the situation in the East, where Senators in Constantinople were not as ploutocratic and where the Senate included a higher percentage of civil servants who owed everything to the Emperor and his government. This unequalities had a huge impact on the economy through possession of the land, the sources of about 85% to 90% of the Empires revenues, the ability to tap the respective manpower pools of the two halves of the Empire. All of these discussions largely started with Jones, although he tended to believe, at the time, that the two halves of the Empire had very much the same problems and that the differences were more a question of degrees than anything else.

Third, this vollume also includes still very valuable chapters on the Church, Religion and Morale and Education and Culture. I would discuss these in any detail, if only because I am supposed to be written a review, not a dissertation. Suffice is to say that this chapters stidying the rise of the Christianity, its growing importance and its impact on the whole of the Empire have also been followed by a prolific amount of studies on the Christinisation of Europe and of both the Westrn and Esatern parts of the Empire. To a large extent, the same kind of conclusion can be reached for Jones' study of the Empire's "Industry, Trade and Transport" (the title of his 21th chapter) and that of "The Land" (the title of his 20th chapter). This has been followed over the next few decades by numerous studies on Late Roman World and the Mediterranean or, to mention two other massive book:
- on the "Origins of the European Economy (300-900)" from Michael McCormick (first published in 2001) and subtitled "Communications and Commerce" and
- Hendy's collection of very valuable "Studies in the BYzantine Monetary Economy (300-1450)".

Both books and authors, and hundreds of others, are significantly indebted to AHM Jones and his Latter Roman Empire, if only as a starting point.
Fonceiah
There is really no substitute for this admittedly dense and difficult to read study of a vital period in the history of the ancient Mediterranean, leading to the Byzantine Empire, which lasted until its conquest by Mehmet II ("The Conqueror") in 1453. Rather artificially broken into two volumes, you will need both. It has a narrative of the Emperors and events of that period, but the really useful aspect of the book is Jones' focus on various topics,: government, finance, administration, the civil service, trade and transport, the main cities and their population, and more.
The West fell in the fifth century, but the Eastern Roman Empire lasted another thousand years. Why? This massive tome may not give a definitive answer to that question, but it certainly gives the serious scholar plenty of the jigsaw puzzle pieces with which to attempt to answer it for him- or herself.