carnevalemanfredonia.it
» » Argument: Critical Thinking, Logic, and the Fallacies, Second Canadian Edition (2nd Edition)

eBook Argument: Critical Thinking, Logic, and the Fallacies, Second Canadian Edition (2nd Edition) download

by John Woods,Andrew Irvine,Douglas Walton

eBook Argument: Critical Thinking, Logic, and the Fallacies, Second Canadian Edition (2nd Edition) download ISBN: 0130399388
Author: John Woods,Andrew Irvine,Douglas Walton
Publisher: Pearson Education Canada; 2 edition (October 31, 2003)
Language: English
Pages: 448
ePub: 1800 kb
Fb2: 1287 kb
Rating: 4.3
Other formats: azw doc mobi mbr
Category: Different
Subcategory: Humanities

This text is designed for the Critical Thinking and Logic courses found in philosophy and general education departments at both universities and . The discussion of fallacies is integrated with logic in a way not seen in other texts.

This text is designed for the Critical Thinking and Logic courses found in philosophy and general education departments at both universities and colleges. The most unique feature of the text is its solid foundation in logic. This treatment provides students with tools to evaluate their own and other peoples thinking logically as well as analyze and assess an argument. Pages: 448, 194. ISBN 10: 0130399388. ISBN 13: 9780130399380.

John Hayden Woods FRSC (born 1937) is a Canadian logician and philosopher (2000) Argument: Critical Thinking Logic and The Fallacies.

John Hayden Woods FRSC (born 1937) is a Canadian logician and philosopher. He currently holds the position of Director of the Abductive Systems Group at the University of British Columbia (UBC) and is The UBC Honorary Professor of Logic. Together with Douglas N. Walton, Woods has authored a number of books and papers on fallacies  . 2000) Argument: Critical Thinking Logic and The Fallacies. Toronto: Prentice-Hall (with Andrew Irvine and Douglas Walton).

View Argument - Critical Thinking, Logic, and the Fallacies 2E (Woods, Irvine, Walton) from ARTH 345 at University of British Columbia. Argument - Critical Thinking, Logic, and the Fallacies 2E (Woods, Irvine, Walton). School University of British Columbia. Course Title ARTH 345. Uploaded By swanluchen.

3 LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING Logic & critical thinking is a process where argument will always be discussed in reference . Fallacy of Ambiguity: The fallacy of Ambiguity is not used intentionally but it is used unintentionally.

3 LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING Logic & critical thinking is a process where argument will always be discussed in reference to the context. prohibition of riba in the light of holy Quran, Ahadith or in fiqa. The study of motion, reaction & genes in the light of physics, chemistry biology respectively. A phrase or word can be ambiguous in a particular context if it can have two or more different meanings in that context. 1. Equivocation: An informal fallacy in which two or more meanings of the same word or phrase have been confused.

In the process, students learn to apply critical thinking to their every day lives. Think Smarter: Critical Thinking to Improve Problem-Solving and Decision-Making Skills. 65 MB·72,177 Downloads·New! brain to do more for you. Written by a critical thinking trainer and coach, the book presents. 08 MB·116,637 Downloads. are page referenced to the text the area of cooperative critical thinking in special courts.

Similar books and articles. Second Thoughts: Critical Thinking for a Diverse Society. Slippery Slope Arguments. Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms. Douglas Walton - 1992 - Oxford University Press. Douglas N. Walton - 1987 - John Benjamins. Why Formal Logic is Essential for Critical Thinking. Donald L. Hatcher - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (1). Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony. Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109. How to Do Things with Logic. C. Grant Luckhardt - 1994 - L. Erlbaum Associates. Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.

2000) Argument: Critical Thinking Logic and The Fallacies. Oxford: Hermes Science Publications. 2003) Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2003) Agenda Relevance: An Essay in Formal Pragmatics. Volume 1 of A Practical Logic of Cognitive Systems, Amsterdam: North Holland (with Dov M. Gabbay)

Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Start by marking Argument: Critical Thinking, Logic and the Fallacies as Want to Read: Want to Read savin. ant to Read.

Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. See a Problem? We’d love your help.

A fine book on informal logic, also known as & thinking'. The difference between the hamburger eating anti-hunter and the venison eating hunter is who killed the food and whether they did it for sport or a paycheck. The treatment of topics throughout is thorough and meticulous; fine analytic distinctions, a large number of real life illustrations, and clear writing enhance the value of the work. In a word, Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation is the best book in the field I have come across in recent years. Roy Martinez, Teaching Philosophy.

Comments: (2)
Goll
Please keep in mind that I am an honor roll student when you read my review.
The textbook is unnecessarily and overly convoluted. There are minimal examples throughout. The format of the textbook has been "condensed" so as to not offer thorough explanations. The examples offered are written inside a paragraph instead of in a separate indent. There are errors throughout it, which my professor has given the corrections, but if you don't have these, you will get very confused as to why your answers do not match the textbook responses.
Another issue I have is when they try to explain a concept only to further confuse the reader with inverses of their point by later putting their point in the correct order. They do that with "to explain this in yet another way" or "one further way to characterize" or "in other words" or "it is easy to see that" (when it is clearly not because it didn't explain it in simpler terms). <-- All that within one page.
In reading a chapter, it takes me HOURS to get through a section because of how overly convoluted it is. Too many "mind-reading" inferences, wherein you are expected to know what the writer implies.

My tutor loaned me her critical thinking textbook and in ONE reading, I completely understood what was being explained. That textbook is "The Power of Critical Thinking, third Canadian Edition" by Lewis Vaughn and Chris MacDonald.

Very disappointed by this textbook. I do not think it should be used in universities unless there is a pre-requisite for the course (prior knowledge of philosophy is a must). If your professor recommends it, request the faculty to reevaluate their textbook choice.
Andromathris
Same book my daughter is using so I can read along with her.